WAS JESUS A HOMOSEXUAL? - Part 2
By
PROPHET YAHWEHSeer of YAHWEH
Archenemy of The New Testament Gospel Scribes Who Lie On Our Messiah!
..........................................................................
Table Of Contents:
By
PROPHET YAHWEHSeer of YAHWEH
Archenemy of The New Testament Gospel Scribes Who Lie On Our Messiah!
..........................................................................
Table Of Contents:
1.) The Love Teachings Of J-Esus
2.) J-Esus Taught Two Men In One Bed Is Allowed In Christianity
3.) Was J-Esus Having Sex With His Boy When Captured By Romans?
4.) Did J-Esus Resurrect To Stop Sex Between His Lover And Disciples?
5.) Did J-Esus Have Sexual Relationships With His Initiates?
6.) Was J-Esus' Lover A Man Or A Woman?
7.) Homosexuals Believe J-Esus Was Gay Like Them
8.) Christian Picture That Suggests Jesus Let Young Boys Perform Oral Sex
On Him Like The Gospels Suggest He Did With His Initiates?
On Him Like The Gospels Suggest He Did With His Initiates?
.........................................................................
1.) THE LOVE TEACHINGS OF J-ESUS
When I began to research the different types of love the evil Gospel scribes say the Christian Jesus taught people, I realized that they fit into the following main categories:
a.) love for the Creator
b.) love for Jesus
c.) love for people in general
d.) the disciples' love for each other
Upon further examination, I noticed another type of love attributed to Jesus. At first glance, this love seems so innocent. But, when all the verses concerning it are analyzed, we see that the Gospels actually suggestJesus was a homosexual who loved other men!
This proves that the Gospels tells lies on our Messiah! It's no way for him to be possessed with the unnatural, nasty, and perverted love of homosexuality!
When you research what sexual acts constitute homosexuality, mainly oral and anal sex, you'll see that they consist of the same acts the priests of J-Esus are perpetrating upon our children today.
Let's take a look at some of these scriptures that reveal the unnatural love that the scribes wrote our Messiah had towards other men.
.....................................................................
2.) J-ESUS TAUGHT TWO MEN IN ONE BED IS ALLOWED IN CHRISTIANITY
Oh, no!
Here the Gospel scribes go again!
In this section, let's take a look at how the demonic writers of the gospels continue to portray our Messiah as a homosexual, every chance they get, in their fraudulent so-called Gospels.
They go on and on and on subliminally implanting the homosexual view of Jesus in your mind when you read their writings.
Take a look at how these devils, from hell, show J-Esus teaching people to accept homosexuality in very innocent looking ways.
In Luke 17:34, it states that:
34. I tell you in the night their shall be two men in one bed; the one shall be taken, and the other shall be left.
Do you realize what this is saying?
Two men in one bed!
Man, this violates the laws of YAHWEH in a very subtle and elusive way!
Real men, who love YAHWEH, would rather rotate one of them sleeping on the floor while the other sleeps in the bed every night than do something like that!
The way the evil scribes are portraying their J-Esus teaching this, it suggests that these two men were in the habit of sleeping with each other every night like a man and his wife, and one night one of them were taken.
Cursed be the writers of the New Testament So-Called Gospels!
Take a look at how these devils, from hell, show J-Esus teaching people to accept homosexuality in very innocent looking ways.
In Luke 17:34, it states that:
34. I tell you in the night their shall be two men in one bed; the one shall be taken, and the other shall be left.
Do you realize what this is saying?
Two men in one bed!
Man, this violates the laws of YAHWEH in a very subtle and elusive way!
Real men, who love YAHWEH, would rather rotate one of them sleeping on the floor while the other sleeps in the bed every night than do something like that!
The way the evil scribes are portraying their J-Esus teaching this, it suggests that these two men were in the habit of sleeping with each other every night like a man and his wife, and one night one of them were taken.
Cursed be the writers of the New Testament So-Called Gospels!
.........................................................................
3.) WAS J-ESUS HAVING SEX WITH HIS BOY WHEN CAPTURED BY THE ROMANS?
The unnatural love that the fraudulent gospels suggest existed between J-Esus and a young man or boy continues to be seen at his arrest.
In Mark 14:51-52, it states:
51. And there followed him a certain young man, having a linen cloth cast about his naked body; and the young men laid hold on him:
52. And he left the linen cloth, and fled from them naked.
Now, what kind of love is it that would make a young man or boy not flee, like J-Esus' disciples did, when the Romans's came?
In Mark 14:51-52, it states:
51. And there followed him a certain young man, having a linen cloth cast about his naked body; and the young men laid hold on him:
52. And he left the linen cloth, and fled from them naked.
Now, what kind of love is it that would make a young man or boy not flee, like J-Esus' disciples did, when the Romans's came?
It had to be more powerful than the love J-Esus' disciples had for him. That's for sure. Because his disciples ran off and left him while the boy stayed!
Not only do the gospels suggest that J-Esus had an unnatural love for a boy, but now we see that the Gospel writers suggest that the boy had an unnatural love for J-Esus as well.
Now consider the type of relationship J-Esus had with a boy who had the nerve to follow him around naked with a sheet around him?
The way this is written, by the demonic writers of the gospels, is that this boy was so use to doing this type of thing that it did not seem wrong to the lad.
When you take into consideration what we saw in John 13:1-23, about J-Esus getting naked before his disciples with his boy between his arms and lying on his chest, and the boy sexually seducing J-Esus to reveal who it was that betrayed him, could it be possible that there was a similar setting when the Romans came to arrest Jesus.
Not only do the gospels suggest that J-Esus had an unnatural love for a boy, but now we see that the Gospel writers suggest that the boy had an unnatural love for J-Esus as well.
Now consider the type of relationship J-Esus had with a boy who had the nerve to follow him around naked with a sheet around him?
The way this is written, by the demonic writers of the gospels, is that this boy was so use to doing this type of thing that it did not seem wrong to the lad.
When you take into consideration what we saw in John 13:1-23, about J-Esus getting naked before his disciples with his boy between his arms and lying on his chest, and the boy sexually seducing J-Esus to reveal who it was that betrayed him, could it be possible that there was a similar setting when the Romans came to arrest Jesus.
Remember that in Mark 14:51-52 it states:
51. And there followed him a certain young man, having a linen cloth cast about his naked body; and the young men laid hold on him:
52. And he left the linen cloth, and fled from them naked.
This suggests that Jesus was having a private moment with the boy somewhere not far away from his disciples.
51. And there followed him a certain young man, having a linen cloth cast about his naked body; and the young men laid hold on him:
52. And he left the linen cloth, and fled from them naked.
This suggests that Jesus was having a private moment with the boy somewhere not far away from his disciples.
Was this another case of the boy lying on top of J-Esus on his bosom?
Or were they doing something more intimate that they would rather not let the disciples see?
The point that suggests that Jesus had the boy some where, privately, is clearly seen when you consider that it appears that the boy did not know that the Romans soldiers had arrived.
The point that suggests that Jesus had the boy some where, privately, is clearly seen when you consider that it appears that the boy did not know that the Romans soldiers had arrived.
But, after walking into the situation, he ran away, after the disciples had long been gone.
Now, this suggests that J-Esus was with the boy privately, away from the disciples, and J-Esus left to find out what was going on, possibly when he heard the sound of his disciples fleeing after they saw the Romans approaching.
Now, this suggests that J-Esus was with the boy privately, away from the disciples, and J-Esus left to find out what was going on, possibly when he heard the sound of his disciples fleeing after they saw the Romans approaching.
This also suggests that, prior to the boy coming from the private place where he was at with J-Esus, away from his disciples, that J-Esus told his boy to stay put until he found out what was going on and that he would be right back.
And, when the boy sensed that something was wrong, and J-Esus was taking to long to come back, he went out to see what was going on with his lover!
Further analysis suggests that the reason why J-Esus was captured by the Roman soldiers was because his was to busy having his last love making session with his boy before he was killed.
Wow!
This suggests that the boy had some serious, potent loving, and J-Esus could not get enough of it, to such a degree, that, J-Esus was paralyzed mentally and did not realize that he was preparing to be captured!
May the writer of the gospel who wrote this subliminal view be damned in hell fire forever!
I hate the gospels for the lies they suggest against our Messiah!
May the writer of the gospel who wrote this subliminal view be damned in hell fire forever!
I hate the gospels for the lies they suggest against our Messiah!
.........................................................................
4.) DID J-ESUS RESURRECT TO STOP SEX BETWEEN HIS LOVER AND DISCIPLES?
Could they have been planning something with J-Esus' boy, like them taking a break from their work and running a sexual train on him, one after the other, out on the water, where most people could not see them, after they finished catching their fish?
Or could it be that one of them was planning to claim J-Esus' vacant leadership position as his own, and in the process, claim J-Esus boy as his own as a way to seal his authority and right to be the leader over all the disciples?
Now you see why I hate the so-called Gospels and recognize them for what they are: damnable documents that are demonic in nature when it comes to the Messiah!
These gospel verses go on to suggest that while they were fishing, the disciples remembered what J-Esus had commanded them to do in John 13:34, which states:
34. "A new commandment I give unto you, That ye love one another; as I have loved you, that ye also love one another."
Also, while out on the boat, where no one can see them, one or more of the disciples obeyed and said, well J-Esus is dead and his lover is here, with us, and we don't have wives, we might as well get us some of this boy's loving like J-Esus did and commanded us to do.
This also suggests that something sexual was preparing to get started and J-Esus appeared just in time to interrupt it and declare - hey, leave him along, that boy is mine!
This is the sickest line of suggestive reasoning to exist in any religious book in the history of the world!
Oh, but it does not stop there!
Later in the chapter, we see another scene of J-Esus relaxing with his disciples, as we saw in John 13:1-26 when he washed their feet with him being naked, with his genitals able to be seen, and afterward with his boy lying on top of him.
You can see this scene in verse 20-22 of John chapter 21, which states:
20. Then Peter, turning about, seeth the disciple whom Jesus loved following; which also leaned on his breast at supper, and said, Lord, which is he that betrayeth thee?
21. Peter seeing him saith to Jesus, Lord, and what shall this man do?
22. Jesus saith unto him, If I will that he tarry till I come what is that to thee? follow thou me.
The sign that this young man or boy, who was naked in the boat, was the same as the one who followed him when the Romans captured J-Esus, can be seen in verse 20 where the youngster is described as following behind J-Esus naked with a sheet wrapped around him .
The gospel writer is clearly portraying this young man or boy as having some kind of feminine relationship because the boy is always in the woman's position when walking according to the custom of that day - always behind her husband and follow his lead!
Wow! Oh, halleluyahweh!
But, now watch this.
In verse 21, you see where Peter asked J-Esus about his boy.
J-Esus answered in such a sarcastic way that it suggests that he was over protective of the boy, even jealous of him.
Now, let's look at some thing very deep that shows us just how sinister the Gospel writers were.
I want to turn your attention to John 21:7,8, 20-22.
It is too much for me to type at this time.
Please read these scriptures, in your bibles, for yourselves.
In it, you see where the demonic Gospel writers wrote that J-Esus appeared to them when they were out on a boat fishing.
I want to bring your attention to verse 7, which states:
7. Therefore that disciple whom Jesus loved saith unto Peter, It is the Lord. Now when Simon Peter heard that it was the Lord, he girt his fisher's coat unto him, (for he was naked,) and did cast himself into the sea.
8. The other disciples came in a little ship; (for they were not far from land, but as it were two hundred cubits,) dragging the net with fishes.
I am sure that those you who can read between the lines noticed the demonstration of an extra ordinary love that "the disciple Jesus loved" had towards him!
Wow!
I want to turn your attention to John 21:7,8, 20-22.
It is too much for me to type at this time.
Please read these scriptures, in your bibles, for yourselves.
In it, you see where the demonic Gospel writers wrote that J-Esus appeared to them when they were out on a boat fishing.
I want to bring your attention to verse 7, which states:
7. Therefore that disciple whom Jesus loved saith unto Peter, It is the Lord. Now when Simon Peter heard that it was the Lord, he girt his fisher's coat unto him, (for he was naked,) and did cast himself into the sea.
8. The other disciples came in a little ship; (for they were not far from land, but as it were two hundred cubits,) dragging the net with fishes.
I am sure that those you who can read between the lines noticed the demonstration of an extra ordinary love that "the disciple Jesus loved" had towards him!
Wow!
This guy jumped into the sea and thought that he could swim back faster than the 11 other disciple could row back.
This reveals a blinding, extraordinary love like that of a woman who lost her virginity to a man.
Now, let me ask you this:
Why in the world was the young man or young boy naked amongst the disciples?
I don't care how hard they were working on the boat, trying to catch fish, it is unthinkable for a man to take off his clothes amongst other men until he is naked!
You don't see fisher men doing that today, and they are dealing with far bigger boats, far greater work, and far greater catches of fish.
Real men would have told that boy:
Now, let me ask you this:
Why in the world was the young man or young boy naked amongst the disciples?
I don't care how hard they were working on the boat, trying to catch fish, it is unthinkable for a man to take off his clothes amongst other men until he is naked!
You don't see fisher men doing that today, and they are dealing with far bigger boats, far greater work, and far greater catches of fish.
Real men would have told that boy:
"Man, what in the world is wrong with you fool? Put some clothes on you idiot and don't ever disrespect us like that again!"
But, J-Esus' disciples did not do that.
But, J-Esus' disciples did not do that.
Could it be that the reason why the "disciple whom J-Esus loved" (the 13th disciple who had no public ministry, like the other 12 disciples, other than to please J-Esus) was naked was because he was trying to seduce the other disciples?
Could they have been planning something with J-Esus' boy, like them taking a break from their work and running a sexual train on him, one after the other, out on the water, where most people could not see them, after they finished catching their fish?
Or could it be that one of them was planning to claim J-Esus' vacant leadership position as his own, and in the process, claim J-Esus boy as his own as a way to seal his authority and right to be the leader over all the disciples?
Now you see why I hate the so-called Gospels and recognize them for what they are: damnable documents that are demonic in nature when it comes to the Messiah!
These gospel verses go on to suggest that while they were fishing, the disciples remembered what J-Esus had commanded them to do in John 13:34, which states:
34. "A new commandment I give unto you, That ye love one another; as I have loved you, that ye also love one another."
Also, while out on the boat, where no one can see them, one or more of the disciples obeyed and said, well J-Esus is dead and his lover is here, with us, and we don't have wives, we might as well get us some of this boy's loving like J-Esus did and commanded us to do.
This also suggests that something sexual was preparing to get started and J-Esus appeared just in time to interrupt it and declare - hey, leave him along, that boy is mine!
This is the sickest line of suggestive reasoning to exist in any religious book in the history of the world!
Oh, but it does not stop there!
Later in the chapter, we see another scene of J-Esus relaxing with his disciples, as we saw in John 13:1-26 when he washed their feet with him being naked, with his genitals able to be seen, and afterward with his boy lying on top of him.
You can see this scene in verse 20-22 of John chapter 21, which states:
20. Then Peter, turning about, seeth the disciple whom Jesus loved following; which also leaned on his breast at supper, and said, Lord, which is he that betrayeth thee?
21. Peter seeing him saith to Jesus, Lord, and what shall this man do?
22. Jesus saith unto him, If I will that he tarry till I come what is that to thee? follow thou me.
The sign that this young man or boy, who was naked in the boat, was the same as the one who followed him when the Romans captured J-Esus, can be seen in verse 20 where the youngster is described as following behind J-Esus naked with a sheet wrapped around him .
The gospel writer is clearly portraying this young man or boy as having some kind of feminine relationship because the boy is always in the woman's position when walking according to the custom of that day - always behind her husband and follow his lead!
Wow! Oh, halleluyahweh!
But, now watch this.
In verse 21, you see where Peter asked J-Esus about his boy.
J-Esus answered in such a sarcastic way that it suggests that he was over protective of the boy, even jealous of him.
This fits in with why he appeared, at first, to stop the boy from having sex on the boat with his disciples.
Judging by his words it was as if J-Esus was trying to back him up off his boy as if to say:
Hey! He's off limits and spoken for! You just focus on the ministry and not my boy!
Now, you see why Peter had to ask the boy to find out who it was that betrayed him after J-Esus washed their feet in John 13, instead of asking J-Esus himself.
Hey! He's off limits and spoken for! You just focus on the ministry and not my boy!
Now, you see why Peter had to ask the boy to find out who it was that betrayed him after J-Esus washed their feet in John 13, instead of asking J-Esus himself.
It appears that Peter was scared to ask J-Esus things, some times, because of the attitude J-Esus would have, especially when Peter asks him about his boy.
Finally, J-Esus reaction seems to suggest that he was kind of against Peter as if he felt Peter wanted his boy all along!
Finally, J-Esus reaction seems to suggest that he was kind of against Peter as if he felt Peter wanted his boy all along!
But, why would J-Esus be like that with the man he said he would build his church upon?
Read Matthew 16:18, which states:
18. AND I SAY ALSO UNTO THEE, THAT THOU ART PETER, AND UPON THIS ROCK I WILL BUILD MY CHURCH; AND THE GATES OF HELL SHALL NOT PREVAIL AGAINST IT.
None of this is consistent with reasoning. All this just doesn't make sense and proves my case that the Gospels are pure forgeries that no disciple ever wrote nor ever read!
If the disciples had read the garbage in the Gospels that have been handed down to us, they would have done a thorough investigation to find out who wrote them and banded that person from the ministry.
Then, they would have written a response to these fake Gospels to counter all the inaccuracies in the flow of reasoning and suggestions in them.
If the disciples had read the garbage in the Gospels that have been handed down to us, they would have done a thorough investigation to find out who wrote them and banded that person from the ministry.
Then, they would have written a response to these fake Gospels to counter all the inaccuracies in the flow of reasoning and suggestions in them.
.........................................................................
5.) DID J-ESUS HAVE SEXUAL RELATIONSHIPS WITH HIS INITIATES?
In 1960 Morton Smith claimed to have discovered, in the Mar Saba monastery near Jerusalem in 1958, a copy of an epistle from Clement of Alexandria to one Theodore. The epistle contained two passages that Clement claimed came from a secret expansion of the canonical gospel of Mark. The story of this Clementine letter, as well as of this secret gospel of Mark, can be found in two books by Morton Smith himself, The Secret Gospel and Clement of Alexandria and the Secret Gospel of Mark.
Because of the, 3 page, "Clementine Letters," there's grounds to say that the gospel of Mark had parts in it, originally, that are missing today.
The reason why these verses are missing is because it went too deep in suggesting the homosexuality of J-Esus.
At that time, when the church found what was thought to be "The Secret Gospel Of Mark," they cried bloody murder against it and claimed it was false and full of lies.
Others, who got edited versions of Mark, thought that the homosexual part did not exist only because it had been taken out by the time they got their copies of Mark. They thought they had the original copies, but they did not.
The reason why these verses are missing is because it went too deep in suggesting the homosexuality of J-Esus.
At that time, when the church found what was thought to be "The Secret Gospel Of Mark," they cried bloody murder against it and claimed it was false and full of lies.
Others, who got edited versions of Mark, thought that the homosexual part did not exist only because it had been taken out by the time they got their copies of Mark. They thought they had the original copies, but they did not.
The great controversy concerning the "Secret Gospel Of Mark" continues unto this very day.
If you can see through all the attacks on the missing verses themselves and be concern only with the original verses, that have been taken out of Mark, then you will see why the Christians try to neutralize them by putting so many attacks before and after the verses.
But, I believe that the statement is true and was a part of Mark, originally, and has been abbreviated and altered into only the few verses that we see in Mark today. We will take a look at those verses, but first let us take a look at the statement that was in the original version of Mark before it was taken out after being discovered.
I got this statement from the following site:
http://www.historian.net/secmark.htm
Below is where the homosexual nature of J-Esus was revealed in the three page letter of Clementine of Alexandria to one Theodore began to talk about the discovery of the homosexual verses in the versions of Mark that were circulating in his day:
If you can see through all the attacks on the missing verses themselves and be concern only with the original verses, that have been taken out of Mark, then you will see why the Christians try to neutralize them by putting so many attacks before and after the verses.
But, I believe that the statement is true and was a part of Mark, originally, and has been abbreviated and altered into only the few verses that we see in Mark today. We will take a look at those verses, but first let us take a look at the statement that was in the original version of Mark before it was taken out after being discovered.
I got this statement from the following site:
http://www.historian.net/secmark.htm
Below is where the homosexual nature of J-Esus was revealed in the three page letter of Clementine of Alexandria to one Theodore began to talk about the discovery of the homosexual verses in the versions of Mark that were circulating in his day:
The last part of page 2:
19 ... So I will not hesitate to answer the questions for you,
20 exposing their lies from the actual words of the gospel.
21 At any rate, after the part, "They were going up on the road to Jerusalem" and the following things
22 until, "after three days he will arise," it takes up according to the text:
23 "And they went to Bethany and there was a woman whose brother had died.
24 And coming up to him, she prostrated herself before Jesus and said to him, 'Son of David,
25 have mercy on me.' But the disciples rebuked her. And becoming angry,
26 Jesus went with her to the garden where the tomb was. And
Page 3:
01 immediately a great sound was heard from the tomb, and Jesus,going toward it
02 rolled away the stone from the entrance to the tomb. And going in immediately where
03 the young man was, he stretched out a hand and raised him up, holding
04 his hand. Then, the man looked at him and loved him and05 he began to call him to his side, that he might be with him. And going from
21 At any rate, after the part, "They were going up on the road to Jerusalem" and the following things
22 until, "after three days he will arise," it takes up according to the text:
23 "And they went to Bethany and there was a woman whose brother had died.
24 And coming up to him, she prostrated herself before Jesus and said to him, 'Son of David,
25 have mercy on me.' But the disciples rebuked her. And becoming angry,
26 Jesus went with her to the garden where the tomb was. And
Page 3:
01 immediately a great sound was heard from the tomb, and Jesus,going toward it
02 rolled away the stone from the entrance to the tomb. And going in immediately where
03 the young man was, he stretched out a hand and raised him up, holding
04 his hand. Then, the man looked at him and loved him and05 he began to call him to his side, that he might be with him. And going from
06 the tomb, they went to the house of the young man. For he was rich. And after
07 six days, Jesus instructed him. And when it was late, the young man went08 to him. He had put a linen around his naked body, and09 he remained with him through that night. For Jesus taught him10 the mystery of the kingdom of God. After he got up from there,11 he turned to the region of the Jordan." And after these things, this follows:12 "James and John go to him," and that whole section.13 But the "naked man with naked man" and the other things you wrote about are
14 not found. After, "and he goes to Jericho," it adds only, "And the
15 brother of the young man whom Jesus loved was there, as well as
07 six days, Jesus instructed him. And when it was late, the young man went08 to him. He had put a linen around his naked body, and09 he remained with him through that night. For Jesus taught him10 the mystery of the kingdom of God. After he got up from there,11 he turned to the region of the Jordan." And after these things, this follows:12 "James and John go to him," and that whole section.13 But the "naked man with naked man" and the other things you wrote about are
14 not found. After, "and he goes to Jericho," it adds only, "And the
15 brother of the young man whom Jesus loved was there, as well as
16 his mother and Salome. And Jesus did not welcome them."17 But the many other things which you wrote both seem, and are, most false. So,
18 the truth according to the right interpretation. . .
Now, the suggestion of J-Esus spending the night with a naked man under a sheet and not letting in the man's family was to much for the Church leaders at that time.
As a result, this account was left out of the book of Mark, from that point on, and was claimed to be a forgery from that moment until today.
When you do a search on the Internet for this document, you will see far more claims of it being false and an insult than you do people considering if the document as authentic or not.
It's as if all the outrage and emotionalism was deliberately done to overwhelm anyone's mind from even considering the truthfulness of the document itself.
18 the truth according to the right interpretation. . .
Now, the suggestion of J-Esus spending the night with a naked man under a sheet and not letting in the man's family was to much for the Church leaders at that time.
As a result, this account was left out of the book of Mark, from that point on, and was claimed to be a forgery from that moment until today.
When you do a search on the Internet for this document, you will see far more claims of it being false and an insult than you do people considering if the document as authentic or not.
It's as if all the outrage and emotionalism was deliberately done to overwhelm anyone's mind from even considering the truthfulness of the document itself.
People end up more influenced by all the fire around the statement than the statement itself.
But, I was able to see through the uproar and why it was so great and see the document for what it is - a segment of Mark that was taken out of the original book of Mark or an updated book the writer of Mark was writing before he died.
One of the reasons why I believe the statement is true and not a fraud is because it is consistent with all the other gospel suggestions of the Christian messiah having been a homosexual that I have been showing you!
It fits right in with them! Perfectly!
But, I was able to see through the uproar and why it was so great and see the document for what it is - a segment of Mark that was taken out of the original book of Mark or an updated book the writer of Mark was writing before he died.
One of the reasons why I believe the statement is true and not a fraud is because it is consistent with all the other gospel suggestions of the Christian messiah having been a homosexual that I have been showing you!
It fits right in with them! Perfectly!
Now, consider this insight.
In Mark 10:17-27, it talks about how a rich young ruler ran to J-Esus and kneeled before him and asked what he could do to inherit eternal life.
And, in verse 21, it says:
21. Then Jesus beholding him loved him...
Now, what is it really saying when it said that when J-Esus seeing him, loved him?
One thing for sure, is that it did not mean that when he saw his face he loved him because he had been conversing with the young man for a while and had seen his face from the beginning of the conversation.
So, his face had nothing to do with the love Jesus was turned on by as time went on with him engaging with the rich young ruler.
When the verse says, "then J-Esus seeing him," what did J-Esus see, of the man, that he did not see at first when he started talking to him?
This suggests that something happened between J-Esus and the young man that had not happened when they were conversing.
What was it?
What could have transpired between the two?
And, when the verses said that after J-Esus saw what he saw of the man, whatever it was, that he did not see when they first started talking, then J-Esus loved him.
Why is it that J-Esus did not love him at first?
Why did it take some time for something to happen for J-Esus to suddenly love him?
If he did not love him at first, then this is not the kind of love you have for a good person you first meet.
If that is the case, what kind of love was it that was different from the general love that Jesus should have had for him from the beginning?
Do you realized what all this suggests!
In Mark 10:17-27, it talks about how a rich young ruler ran to J-Esus and kneeled before him and asked what he could do to inherit eternal life.
And, in verse 21, it says:
21. Then Jesus beholding him loved him...
Now, what is it really saying when it said that when J-Esus seeing him, loved him?
One thing for sure, is that it did not mean that when he saw his face he loved him because he had been conversing with the young man for a while and had seen his face from the beginning of the conversation.
So, his face had nothing to do with the love Jesus was turned on by as time went on with him engaging with the rich young ruler.
When the verse says, "then J-Esus seeing him," what did J-Esus see, of the man, that he did not see at first when he started talking to him?
This suggests that something happened between J-Esus and the young man that had not happened when they were conversing.
What was it?
What could have transpired between the two?
And, when the verses said that after J-Esus saw what he saw of the man, whatever it was, that he did not see when they first started talking, then J-Esus loved him.
Why is it that J-Esus did not love him at first?
Why did it take some time for something to happen for J-Esus to suddenly love him?
If he did not love him at first, then this is not the kind of love you have for a good person you first meet.
If that is the case, what kind of love was it that was different from the general love that Jesus should have had for him from the beginning?
Do you realized what all this suggests!
.........................................................................
6.) WAS J-ESUS' LOVER A MAN OR WOMAN?
The Christians have been hearing about the things I am saying about the Gospel's suggestions that J-Esus has a homosexual relationship with one of his disciples for centuries.
Now, Christians are launching a massive worldwide effort to make it look like that lover the gospels suggest J-Esus had was a woman.
They are trying to change it from a male lover to a female lover so it won't look that bad for their J-Esus.
Now, Christians are launching a massive worldwide effort to make it look like that lover the gospels suggest J-Esus had was a woman.
They are trying to change it from a male lover to a female lover so it won't look that bad for their J-Esus.
Books like the Da Vinci Code, and movies about it, try to dispel the rumor that J-Esus has a homosexual lover, based on the hidden meaning of the gospels.
They hope this will work to stamp out the suggestion that if it was a male then J-Esus had to have been a homosexual.
They would rather it be that J-Esus was a fornicator who had a mistress than for it to be that he was a homosexual whose lover was a male.
Christians can write all the books and make all the movies they want to change this, but the fact remains that in John 21:20-21 the gospels make it clear that the disciple Jesus loved was a man. It
states:
20. Then Peter, turning about, seeth the disciple whom Jesus loved following; which also leaned on his breast at supper, and said, Lord which is he that betrayeth thee?
21. Peter seeing him saith to Jesus, Lord, and what shall this MAN do?
So, let there be no doubt that J-Esus' secret lover, that the gospels suggest he had, was most definitely a man and not a woman!
But for argument's sake, let's say that J-Esus' secret lover was a woman.
Then, it may lessen the offense, but it still makes him a fornicator and liar in that he had a woman in bed while acting like he was celibate.
And, in doing this, the suggestion that follows is that J-Esus caused people to believe and live his lie!
This was really him deceiving humanity, so perfectly that Paul and many other Christians have been remaining celibate for centuries based on J-Esus having deceived all future generations of Christians!
This he did by openly appearing celibate, while secretly having sex with either a man or a woman.
And, if the suggestion is true that it was a man, then the subsequent suggestion is that J-Esus and that man were, possibly, having oral and anal sex with each other.
Those damnable gospels are lies against our Messiah!
.........................................................................
7.) HOMOSEXUALS BELIEVE J-ESUS WAS GAY LIKE THEM
I have explained how that the satanic writers of the NT gospels suggest, in their so-called Gospels, that the Christian messiah was a homosexual.
They also suggested that the messiah, they want us to believe in, liked to get naked before his disciples and have a young man/boy lying on his chest (in between his arms).
At that time, I told you all that this was a lie against the true Messiah and a utter impossibility.
The purpose of this email is to let you know that homosexuals believe, as a fact, what I was telling you.
And, their belief, in this being a fact, is why they created a play on J-Esus being a homosexual!
Below are the links to the play with a homosexual Jesus:
http://www.cwnews.com/news/viewstory.cfm?recnum=7541
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/scotland/4085023.stm
Rumors have surfaced in the news that now, homosexuals are preparing to create a movie about J-Esus being a fagot.
So, if this is true, that play must have been really appealing and successful for them to be trying to make a movie about it now.
They also suggested that the messiah, they want us to believe in, liked to get naked before his disciples and have a young man/boy lying on his chest (in between his arms).
At that time, I told you all that this was a lie against the true Messiah and a utter impossibility.
The purpose of this email is to let you know that homosexuals believe, as a fact, what I was telling you.
And, their belief, in this being a fact, is why they created a play on J-Esus being a homosexual!
Below are the links to the play with a homosexual Jesus:
http://www.cwnews.com/news/viewstory.cfm?recnum=7541
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/scotland/4085023.stm
Rumors have surfaced in the news that now, homosexuals are preparing to create a movie about J-Esus being a fagot.
So, if this is true, that play must have been really appealing and successful for them to be trying to make a movie about it now.
.........................................................................
8.) CHRISTIAN PICTURES WHICH SUGGESTS THAT J-ESUS LET YOUNG BOYS PERFORM ORAL SEX ON HIM LIKE THE GOSPELS SUGGEST HE DID WITH HIS INITIATES?
Click on the picture to enlarge it for better viewing:
This is a color xerox of a page from a Catholic picture book. My friend P.PAN sent it to me. Here's the cogent part of his accompanying letter:
[...] I'm also enclosing a copy (again totally unaltered) of a page from a Young Catholic Prayerbook called ``FRIENDS WITH GOD''. This illustration accompanies an informative text explaining the `act of contrition' ("O my God I am heartily sorry for having offended thee, and I detest all my sins...").
.....................................................................
[...] P.PAN
.....................................................................
I have been blessed by the most holy and wonderful YAHWEH to take you on a journey, into the fake Christian Gospels, to point out how wicked scribes where suggesting, to humanity, with out most people realizing it, that Jesus was a homosexual.
IN CLOSING, HOW DO YOU THINK A HOMOSEXUAL WOULD VIEW ALL THE HOMOSEXUAL SUGGESTIONS IN THE SCRIPTURES YOU HAVE SEEN THROUGH ME?
WOULD HE INTERPRET THEM AS MOST PEOPLE WOULD?
OH, NO.
HE OR SHE WOULD NOT.
THEY WOULD SEE A SPECIAL MESSAGE IN BETWEEN THE LINES OF THOSE SCRIPTURES THAT THEY FELT WERE ESPECIALLY FOR THEM.
THEY WOULD FEEL A SPECIAL CONNECTION BETWEEN THEM AND THE BIBLE THAT WOULD ALLOW HIM TO STILL BE HOMOSEXUAL WHILE THINKING THAT THE CREATOR LOVED THEM IN SPITE OF WHAT THE LAWS OF YAHWEH SAY.
YES, THEY WOULD SAY GOD LOVES THEM AND THEY'D BE UP IN THE CHURCHES JUST LIKE HOMOSEXUALS ARE TODAY.
WHY DO YOU THINK THERE ARE SO MANY HOMOSEXUAL CHURCHES APPEARING EVERY WHERE?
IT'S BECAUSE THEY SEE, IN SCRIPTURES, WHAT I HAVE REVEALED TO YOU.
IN CLOSING, HOW DO YOU THINK A HOMOSEXUAL WOULD VIEW ALL THE HOMOSEXUAL SUGGESTIONS IN THE SCRIPTURES YOU HAVE SEEN THROUGH ME?
WOULD HE INTERPRET THEM AS MOST PEOPLE WOULD?
OH, NO.
HE OR SHE WOULD NOT.
THEY WOULD SEE A SPECIAL MESSAGE IN BETWEEN THE LINES OF THOSE SCRIPTURES THAT THEY FELT WERE ESPECIALLY FOR THEM.
THEY WOULD FEEL A SPECIAL CONNECTION BETWEEN THEM AND THE BIBLE THAT WOULD ALLOW HIM TO STILL BE HOMOSEXUAL WHILE THINKING THAT THE CREATOR LOVED THEM IN SPITE OF WHAT THE LAWS OF YAHWEH SAY.
YES, THEY WOULD SAY GOD LOVES THEM AND THEY'D BE UP IN THE CHURCHES JUST LIKE HOMOSEXUALS ARE TODAY.
WHY DO YOU THINK THERE ARE SO MANY HOMOSEXUAL CHURCHES APPEARING EVERY WHERE?
IT'S BECAUSE THEY SEE, IN SCRIPTURES, WHAT I HAVE REVEALED TO YOU.
BUT, THEY INTERPRET JESUS' SUGGESTED HOMOSEXUALITY IN A WAY THAT APPROVES OF THEIR HOMOSEXUALITY AND RIGHT TO PARTICIPATE IN THE CHURCH AND EVEN HAVE GAY CHURCHES WITH GAY PASTORS WHERE ALL THE MEMBERS ARE GAY!
Please send this email to "ALL" your family, loved ones, and friends.
All of them need to know how devilish scribes portrayed our Messiah's character when they wrote the New Testament Gospels.
Don't forget to do this!
Please help me get the word out about this.
All those dear to you should know about this study first.
Send it to them immediately after reading this email.
Don't hesitate to do this; in fact, take out the time to do it now.
This will allow them to sign up to receive all other releases I send out on this topic and others like it.
To receive more emails from me about this and other subjects, go sign up for my students' newsletter at:
Here's my student's web site that you will be able to enter only after joining my student's group above:
Sincerely Yours In YAHWEH's Truth About Our Messiah,
PROPHET YAHWEH
Seer of Yahweh
Master Salvation Teacher
Master UFO Caller
Humanitarian
......................................................................
the end
No comments:
Post a Comment