WAS JESUS A HOMOSEXUAL?

Part 3 of a 3 part series


Reveals Why Christian Religious Leaders In Every Major City, State,
And Nation On Earth Are Raping, Molesting, And Forcing Young Boys To
Have Anal And Oral Sex With Them

By

PROPHET YAHWEH

Seer of YAHWEH

Archenemy of The New Testament Gospels

.....................................................................


Table Of Contents:

1. The Love Teachings Of Jesus

2. Did Jesus Have An Unnatural Love For One Of His Disciples That He
Did Not Have For His Other Disciples?

3. Jesus Arrest And His Naked Boy

4. Did Jesus Resurrect To Keep His Lover From Having Sex With His
Disciples?

5. Christian Picture That Suggests Jesus Let Young Boys Perform Oral
Sex On Him

.....................................................................


1. The Love Teachings Of Jesus

When I began to research the different types of love the Gospels say
the Christian Jesus taught people, I realized that they fit into the
following main categories:

1. love for the Creator

2. love for Jesus

3. love for people in general

4. the disciples' love for each other

Upon further examination, I noticed another type of love attributed
to Jesus. At first glance, this love seems so innocent. But, when
all the verses concerning it are analyzed, we see that the Gospels
actually suggest Jesus was a homosexual who loved other men!

This proves that the Gospels tells lies on our Messiah! It's not way
for him to be possessed with the unnatural, nasty, and perverted
love of homosexuality!

When you research what sexual acts constitute homosexuality, you'll
see that they consist of the same acts the representatives of Jesus
are perpetrating upon our children today, mainly anal and oral sex.

Let's take a look at some of these scriptures that reveal the
unnatural love that the Gospels say our Messiah had towards other
men.

.....................................................................
.

2. Did Jesus Have An Unnatural Love For One Of His Disciples That He
Did Not Have For His Other Disciples?

Earlier, on Part 2, we looked at John 13:23. At that time, I
explained how this Gospel suggests that Jesus was a homosexual. It
portrays him taking off his clothes and getting naked before his
disciples and allowing one of his disciples to lie in his bosom,
intimately, as if he was a woman.

For the detail I did not comment on the point I'm preparing to make
about John 13:23. I chose to save what I have to say for the moment.
Let's take a closer look at this verse:

23. "Now, there was leaning on Jesus' bosom one of his disciples,
WHOM JESUS LOVED."

Many years ago, when I first read this verse, it seemed strange to
me. I thought Jesus loved all of his disciples the same. But, this
verse suggests that our Messiah had another type of love for one of
his disciples that he did not have towards his other disciples.

Now, let's take a look at John 19:26-27. In this scene, Jesus was
nailed to the cross and right before he died, John stated the
following:

26. "When Jesus therefore saw his mother, and the disciple standing
by, WHOM HE LOVED, he saith unto his mother, Woman, behold thy son!

27. "Then saith he to the disciple, Behold thy mother! And from that
hour that disciple took her unto his own home."

I would imagine that for centuries, many Christians have broken down
in tears after reading these two verses without seeing the
unlikelihood of them.

These verses go against all logic concerning them!

For Mary to have gone, that hour, into that disciple's home would
not have been right because Mary was married to Joseph! This would
have violated the marriage laws of YAHWEH and been considered
adulterous.

Also, it suggests that Mary was abandoned by Joseph and was homeless
and did not have a place to live.

Both these points are highly unlikely!

Why would the Messiah send his mother into another man's home when
his disciples could have put her in her own home where she would
have had many servants there for her until the day she died?

All this suggests that Jesus had a love, and an unnatural love at
that, towards the disciple he loved obviously more than he loved his
other disciples. And, that this love clouded his judgment and caused
him to make an unwise decision concerning how his mother would be
cared for.

.....................................................................

3. Jesus Arrest And His Naked Boy

The unnatural love that the fraudulent gospels suggest existed
between Jesus and a young man or boy continues to be seen at his
arrest.

In Mark 14:51-52 it states:

51. And there followed him a certain young man, having a linen cloth
cast about his naked body; and the young men laid hold on him:

52. And he left the linen cloth, and fled from them naked.

Now, what kind of love is it that would make a young man or boy not
flee like everyone else when the Roman's came? It had to be more
powerful than the love Jesus' disciples had for him. That's for sure!

So, not only do the gospels suggest that Jesus had an unnatural love
for a boy, but now we see that they suggest that the boy had an
unnatural love for Jesus as well.

Now consider the type of relationship Jesus had with a boy who had
the nerve to follow him around naked with a sheet around him?

The way this is written by the demonic writers of the gospels is
that this boy was so use to doing this type of thing that it did not
seem wrong to the boy.

When you take into consideration what we saw in John 13:23, about
Jesus getting naked before his disciples with his boy between his
arms and lying on Jesus chest, and the boy sexually seducing Jesus
to reveal who it was that betrayed him, a suggestion comes to mind
that, this was the setting when the Romans came to arrest Jesus.

But, what we see is a view of how the boy might have been dressed in
John 13:23, that was not revealed in those scriptures, when we see
how he was dressed when the Romans came - naked under a sheet.

This suggests that Jesus was having a private moment with the boy
somewhere not far away from his disciples. Was this another case of
the  boy lying on his bosom? Or were they doing something more
intimate that they would rather not let the disciples see?

The point that suggests that Jesus had the boy somewhere privately
is seen with your mind's eye more clearly when you consider that it
appears that the boy did not know that the Romans where there, but
ran away, like the disciples did, only after walking into the
situation.

Now, this suggests that Jesus was with the boy privately, and left
to find out what was going on, possibly when he heard his disciples
becoming emotional after they saw the Roman approaching, or hearing
them run away because of it.

This suggests that then Jesus told his boy or young man to stay put
until he found out what is going on and that he would be right back.

And, when the boy sensed that something was wrong and Jesus was
taking to long to come back, he went out to see what was going on
with his lover Jesus!

Further analysis suggest that the reason why Jesus was captured by
the Romans was because his was to busy having his last love making
session with this kid.

Boy! This suggests that the boy had some serious loving, and Jesus
could not get enough of it, to be able to cause who the Christians
call "God in the flesh" to not realize that he was preparing to be
captured!

May the writer of the gospel who wrote this subliminal view be
damned in hell fire forever!

I hate the gospels for the lies they suggest against our Messiah who
never could have been anything like the gospels suggest.

.....................................................................


4. Did Jesus Resurrect To Keep His Lover From Having Sex With His
Disciples?

Now, let us look at some thing very deep that shows us just how
sinister the gospel writers.

I want to turn your attention to John 21:7, 20-22.

It is too much for me to type at this time.

However, you read these scriptures in your bibles for yourselves.

In it, you see were the demonic gospel writers wrote that Jesus
appeared to them when they were out on a boat fishing.

I want to bring your attention to verse 7, which states:

7. Therefore that disciple whom Jesus loved saith unto Peter, It is
the Lord. Now when Simon Peter heard that it was the Lord, he girt
his fisher's coat unto him, (for he was naked,) and did cast himself
into the sea.

8. The other disciples came in a little ship; (for they were not far
from land, but as it were two hundred cubits,) dragging the net with
fishes.

I am sure that those you with a developed mind's eye and can read
between the lines noticed the demonstration of an extra ordinary
love that the disciple Jesus loved had toward him!

Wow! This guy jumped into the sea and thought that he could swim
back faster than the 11 other disciple could row back. This reveals
a blinding love like the way a woman and homosexual men, who have
lost their virginity for the very first time, and they have a crazy
kind of love as a result.

Now, let me ask you this:

Why in the world was the young man or boy naked amongst the
disciples?

I don't care how hard they were working on the boat trying to catch
fish, it is unthinkable for a man to take off his clothes amongst
other men until he is naked!

You don't see fisher men that do that today and they are dealing far
bigger boats, far greater work, and far greater catches of fish.

Real men would have told that boy: Man, what in the world is wrong
with you fool? Man, good put some clothes on you idiot and don't
ever disrespect us like that again!

But, Jesus disciples did not do that.

Could they have been planning something like them taking a break
from their work and running a train on the boy, sexually, one after
the other?

Or could it be that one of them, was planning to claim Jesus'
vacant leadership position as his own, and in the process, claim
Jesus boy as his own as a way to seal his authority and right to be
the leader over all the disciples?

Now you see why I hate the so-called gospels and recognize them for
what they are damnable documents that are demonic in nature when it
comes to the Messiah!

These gospel verses go on to suggest that while they were fishing,
the disciples remembered what Jesus had commanded them to do in John
13:34, which states:

34. "A new commandment I give unto you, That ye love one another; as
I have loved you, that ye also love one another."

And, that while out on the boat, where no one can see them, one or
more of the disciples obeyed and said, well Jesus is dead and his
lover is here, and we don't have wives so we might as well get us
some of this boy's loving like Jesus did and commanded us to do.

This also suggests that something got started and Jesus appeared
just in time to interrupt it as if to declare with his presence -
hey, leave him along, the boy is mine!

This is the sickest line of suggestive reasoning to exist in any
religious book in the history of the world!

Oh, but it does not stop there!

Later in the chapter, we see another scene of Jesus relaxing with
his disciples as we saw in John 13 when he washed their feet naked,
with his genitals able to be seen, and had his boy lying on top of
him.

You can see this scene in verse 20-22 of John chapter 21, which
states:

20. Then Peter, turning about, seeth the disciple whom Jesus loved
following; which also leaned on his breast at supper, and said,
Lord, which is he that betrayeth thee?

21. Peter seeing him saith to Jesus, Lord, and what shall this man
do?

22. Jesus saith unto him, If I will that he tarry till I come what
is that to thee? follow thou me.

Now, the sign that this young man, who was naked in the boat, was
the same as the one who followed him wrapped with a sheet when the
Romans captured Jesus, we see in verse 20 where the young man is
present as following behind Jesus again.

The gospel writer is clearly portraying this young man or boy as
having some kind of feminine relationship because the boy is always
in the woman's position when walking according to the custom of that
day - always behind her husband and follow his lead!

Wow! Oh, halleluyahweh!

But, now watch this.

In verse 21, you see where Peter asked Jesus about his boy.

And, Jesus answered in such a sarcastic way that it suggests that he
was over protective of the boy, even jealous of him, which fits in
with why he appeared at first to stop the boy from having sex on the
boat with his disciples. Judging by his words it was as if Jesus was
trying to back him up off his boy as if to say:

Hey! He's off limits and spoken for! You just focus on the ministry
and not my boy!

Now, you see why Peter had to ask the boy to find out who it was
that betrayed him after Jesus washed their feet in John 13 , instead
of asking Jesus himself. It appears that Peter was scared to ask
Jesus things sometimes because of the attitude Jesus would have with
him at times, especially when Peter asks him about his boy.

Finally, Jesus reaction seems to suggest that he was kind of against
Peter as if he felt Peter wanted his boy all along!

But, why would Jesus be like that with the man he said he would
build his church upon?

None of this is consistent with reasoning. All this just doesn't
make sense and proves my case that the gospels are pure forgeries
that no disciple ever wrote nor ever read!

If the disciples had read the garbage in the gospels, they would
have done a thorough investigation to find out who wrote them and
banded that person from the ministry.

Then, they would have written a response to these fake gospels to
counter all the inaccuracies in the flow of reasoning and
suggestions in them.

.....................................................................


Dear list,

Hopefully, you understand more why I say that the gospels are
forgeries are a lie.

It's because they suggest that our Messiah had a demonic and
sexually perverted character.

And, I say dam the so-called gospels! (dam is in the bible and I did
not use profanity) and to hell away with them!

The Christian church forged those lying documents!

Sincerely,

Prophet Yahweh
Seer of Yahweh
prophetyahweh@yahoo.com

.....................................................................

the end